Wednesday, 27 March 2019

Jesus as Fulfiller and Christ as Prajapati- Introduction to Christian Theologies in India (ICTI)

SHARE
Christology in Indian Traditional Approach

Jesus as Fulfiller

J.N. Farquhar (1861-1929) theology was based on the fulfillment Theory. Hinduism has gleams of light in it and a Hindu is right in following it until the higher light reaches them. In Hinduism there is an aspiration which would be considered as preparation for Christ, and every important Christian truth is part of Hinduism. He uses the fulfillment idea in evolutionary sense and sees the process of fulfillment as a radical displacement of Hinduism by Christianity. He utilized the fulfillment theory to Hinduism and presented his interpretation regarding the relationship between Christianity and Hinduism.

Farquhar argues that Christianity or rather Christ is the crown of Hinduism. He painted this notion creatively in his book ‘The crown of Hinduism’. Christ provides the fulfillment of each highest aspiration and aims of Hinduism. Every true motive which is in Hinduism has found expression in unclean, debasing, or unworthy practices finds in Him fullest exercise in work for the downtrodden, the ignorant, the sick, and the sinful. In Him is focused every ray of light that shines in Hinduism. Christ is breathing life into the Hindu people. Unlike other missionaries he never rejected Hinduism as evil but he considered it in line with fulfillment. The Christianity that he talks of is not Christianity as it is practiced by Christians but Christianity as it springs from Christ himself. In fact, he passes for Christ to Christianity and back as if they were identical

Christ as Prajapati

This notion was proposed by Krishna Mohan Banerjee. He discusses the self-sacrifice of Prajapati, as the key to the understanding of the meaning of sacrifice. Krishna Mohan opines that the biblical doctrine of salvation by the sacrifice of Christ finds a remarkable counterpart in the Vedic understanding of salvation by the self-sacrifice of Prajapati. According to KM Banerjee the meaning of Prajapati coincides with the meaning of the name and office of the historical reality of Jesus Christ. The name Prajapati not only means “the Lord of the creatures” but also supporter, feeder and deliverer of his creatures. The name ‘Jesus’ in Hebrew means the same ‘the name of Prajapati’, therefore, singularly corresponds to the name of Jesus”. Then he shows how Jesus and Jesus alone, fulfils what Prajapati stood for in the primitive Vedic tradition and that Jesus is the true Prajapati; and the Christian Church – the true Ark of salvation.

Christ is the true Prajapati – the true Purusha begotten in the beginning before all worlds, and Himself both God and Man. The doctrines of saving sacrifice, the primary religious rites of the Rig Veda – of the double character Priest and victim, variously called Prajapati, Purusha and Viswakarma.

For him Christ is the true Prajapati who is the Lord and creator who sacrificed himself and the true Purusha who is both divine and human. In Hinduism there are several Prajapati and Banerjee focus is limited to the Prajapati of Purusha Sukta of Rg Veda. While Jesus is the true Prajapti, or the diamond, the doctrines of the Vedas are only fragments of the diamond sparkling amidst dust. While Jesus is the true sun and the true light, the Vedic doctrines are planets reflecting, though feebly, the light of the Sun. So, according to KM Banerjee Christ is only Lord of creator and protector, who is the true source of light encompassing all humanity and for all.

SHARE

Author: verified_user