Discussion
on terms of Primal Religion
The
religion of the people who live in isolation and in the hills and
forests has been given many names by the scholars.
- Animism: Sir Edward B. Tylor defines it as “the belief that all living things as well as everything held by primitive man to be living because of its locomotion or its ability to assume for itself some power or animated by spirits.”Although this view influenced many scholars for a long time, it is not generally accepted anymore because the attitude of animism is retained even after a higher form of religion is reached.
- Tribal Religion: This term is used because the people who practice this religion are in tribal stage of organization. While this is certainly applicable to many situations in the world, as it is to the tribals in India also, since the basic features of their religions are confined not only to them but to all peoples of the world, this term cannot be exclusively used.
- Preliterate Religion: this term is used by some to mean the religion of the people who do not have written language an
d script. In this theory, literacy is used in a narrow sense of one who can read and write. However, it must be admitted that oral literacy also is part of literacy. Therefore, it is a rather narrow outlook. - Primitive Religion: It is a term which is very widely used Many scholars, especially the Western writers, tend to use the term “primitive” in the sense of being inferior, and thus when it is applied to human beings and their religions, it implies the mistaken notion of mental processes which are pre-logical and qualitatively inferior to that of the so-called civilized peoples who assume superiority of race, knowledge and culture over against other races. However, when we examine the so-called ‘primitive’ people’s 46 mentality and other ways of life objectively, we will find that they are not ‘primitive’ mentally, spiritually and in their moral standard. These people have acute mind and intrinsic intelligence and have a profound thinking and rationalistic ability in their own way. They also have a great deal of originality in many areas of life. They have a long history, though unwritten, behind them. Thus this term is seldom used today.
- Primal Religion: This is the term many scholars now pefer. When we study the religion and practices of the tribal people we will find that many of the basic features of these people are basic or primary in the religions of the world. Thus Dr. Harold W. Turner in his booklet Living Tribal Religions argues that Primal Religions “both anteceded the great historic religions and continue to reveal many of the basic or primary features of religion.”
- The Dalits and their history: discussion on terms such as ‘depressed classes,’ ‘harijans,’ and ‘dalits.’ Historical factors leading to marginalization of groups in society.
The term
“Dalit” is derived from the Sanskrit root dal,
which means burst, split, broken or torn apart. In contemporary
times, the term has come to mean things or persons who are scattered,
torn apart or crushed. This contemporary usage to specify a section
of the people of India who have suffered oppression throughout
history under the prevailing religious and social norms goes back
only a few decades. But it must be clearly known that the term Dalit
does not mean caste or low caste; it is used to refer to those people
who are living in deplorable conditions because of social
conventions.
Professor
Gangadhar Pantawane
explained Dalit as, “Dalit is not a caste. Dalit is a symbol of
change and revolution. The Dalit believes in humanism. He rejects
existence of God, rebirth, soul, sacred books that teach
discrimination, fate, and heaven,because these have made him a slave.
He represents the exploited man in country. Dalitness is essentially
a means towards achieving a sense of cultural identity. The
inferiority complex based on ‘to be Dalit’ has now disappeared.”
Martin
Macwan explains it as,
“Dalit is the person who believes in equality of all human beings,
who practices equality in one’s own life and who protests wherever
human beings are treated unequally. Dalit therefore is not a caste
identity but it is a moral position.”
In the 19th
century, the reformer and revolutionary Mahatma
Jyotiba Phule
(1826-1890) had used the term shudra-atishudra
where shudra
refer to the touchables and the atishudra
referring to the untouchable backward castes. In the 20th century,
Dr. B.R. Ambedkar
(1891-1956) used the English term ‘untouchable’ for Dalit. In
1973, the Dalit Panther Movement of the Indian state of Maharashtra,
gave new meaning to this term when they issued a manifesto in which
they describe a Dalit as: “members of the scheduled castes and
tribes, neo-Buddhists, the working people, the landless and poor
peasants, women and all those who are being exploited politically,
economically and in the name of religion.” For them, the term is no
longer a mere name or title, but an expression of hope.
In this
sense, the Dalit people are those who, on the basis of caste
distinctions, have been considered “outcastes,” as they are left
out of the graded four-fold caste structure of Indian society. On the
basis of this status, they have been oppressed and exploited over the
centuries.
Dalits are
called by different names in different parts of the country. In most
cases, the names in which they are called are despicable or
contemptuous. They include: Dasa, Dasysa, Raksasa, Asura, Avarna,
Nisada, Panchama, Chandala, Harijan and Untouchable.
Historical
factors
The present
condition of the Dalits is the result of the long process of the
stratification of the Indian society through the centuries. The
four-fold castes eventually gave rise to roughly 3000 sub-castes. The
untouchables are actually outside of the list. It should be known
that the Dalits or the outcastes or untouchables are at the bottom of
the social strata and outside. According to the system, birth
determines the caste, not merit or talent. This system was developed
from the idea that the different strata were formed from the body of
God. The Purusa hymn
mentions four castes in this way:
The
Brahmin was his mouth, of both his arms was the Rajanya (Kshatriya)
made, His thighs became the Vaisya, from his feet the Sudra was
produced.
Some of the
literary sources from which we can cull some knowledge about the
Dalits are the Rigvedas,
Upanishads,
Ramayana
and the Mahabharata.
As quoted above, the Purusa
hymn talked about the
system. The Dalits are referred to as Avarna, Dasa and Dasyus. In the
Upanishads,
the problem got worse as the Dalits came to be compared with a dog
and a swine. In the Valmiki
Ramayana, a Shudra
named Shambuka was killed because he practiced penance. Even in the
Mahabharata, an
indigenous boy Ekalabya had to lose his thumb because he has the
audacity to learn archery.
This caste
system, in conjunction with the Hindu scriptures, survived the
centuries. This meant that the caste system received some sort of
divine patronage. The desire to break free was however dampened by
the collective ennui of the masses so much so that the outcasts
themselves came to accept it.
Social
Conditions
Even
today, the Dalits are face difficulties in the academic field and in
ownership or properties. The practice of untouchability was abolished
by the Indian Constitution in 1950. Even though Article 17 of the
Indian Constitution states, “Untouchability is abolished and its
practice in any form is forbidden,” Dalits continue to experience
hardships in all their walks of life. This is a very big tragedy for
a fast developing country like India. Dalits are commonly
discriminated. This continues to be a reality mostly in rural India.
Most Dalits remain poor too, without land or proper employment. Many
of them are forced to work in inhumane conditions of work, in the
streets, in the garbage dumps and others places – all for a meager
amount of money. Of the 700 million Dalits mentioned before, roughly
37% live below the poverty line and more than half of the Dalit
children are malnourished. Many of them are illiterate and are
segregated upon. They remain untouchables in many parts of the
country. According to the report of Martin Macwan titled Dalit
Rights, untouchability
can be witnessed in the following categories – Drinking water, food
and beverages, religion, touch, access to public
facilities/institutions/services, caste-based occupations, practices,
prohibitions/social sanctions, discrimination in private sector and
discrimination in public facility.
- The Main features of Primal and Dalit Religion
The main
features of Primal religion
1.
Supreme Being: The
Supreme Being, the Creator and the Sustainer of the universe, is
generally neglected except on special occasions or when His help is
sought when everything else has failed, and He is remembered in every
important festivals and social occasions such as birth, marriage and
death. He is also called upon to judge in solemn oath-taking and
during natural calamities such as earthquake, cyclone, drought and
famine. The Supreme Being is not only the Creator and the Sustainer
of the universe, but is also the father of gods and human beings, and
among many tribes god is believed to uphold the moral law.
2.
Spirits: Besides the
Supreme God, there are many spirits which the tribals worship. The
benevolent spirits are generally that of the village tutelary,
sub-clan, household, ancestor, paddy or cultivation land. The
malevolent spirits are generally that of the village boundary,
village outskirts, the mountains and hills, lakes, rocks, big trees.
There are also the mischievous spirits and ghosts which are not
objects of worship and sacrifice but which have to be exorcised
mainly through magic.
3. Mana:
Mana is a kind of force or power found in any object such as a
peculiar stone, tree or plant; it may also be found in animals and
human beings. The test of whether an object or a person or an animal
has a mana is the result it can produce. Thus, a Melanesian, for
example, may find a strange-shaped stone, which he may consider to
have mana. Then he will take it home and bury it in his garden, and
if he gets a very good crop he will come to the conclusion that it is
a man
to produce good crop, and he will keep it for this purpose.
4.
Fetishisms: it is a
term adopted by modern English from the Portuguese word feitico or a
charm, a word derived from Latin facticius. A fetish may be defined
as an object which is believed to be inhabited by a spirit and thus
supposed to confer its power upon the person who possesses it as his
fetish. A fetish may be a queer-shaped stone, a bright bead, a stick,
a feather, a claw of beasts, a bone, or a seed or any other curious
object.
5.
Taboo: the word,
‘taboo’ is taken from a Polynesian dialect, and introduced into
English by captain James Cook in 1777. Taboo is a caution or
prohibition against supernatural objects, plants, animals or human
beings who possess mana. Thus anything that is believed to be taboo
should not be touched, smelled, tasted or heard because such an act
will lead to an automatic supernatural anger or penalty. Some
examples are given below. Taboos connected with supernatural Beings:
There are taboos against offending the gods, spirits, against cutting
the sacred trees which are believed to be the abode of the spirits,
against cutting sacred grove or women entering into the sacred grove,
etc.
6.
Totemism: a very
common social and religious phenomenon in many parts of the world is
the representation of ancestors in the form of totems. The word
“totem” comes from the language of the Ojibway Indian tribe of
North America meaning “brother-sister kin”. It, therefore,
signifies a group or a close relationship, blood-kinship as between
members of a family. A totem is usually of an animal or of plant or
insect or bird and very rarely a class of inanimate objects, very
closely related to a group in that the group is believed to descend
from the animal or any of the species mentioned above. Totemism,
therefore, is a ‘form of social organization and religious
practice, typically involving an intimate association between sibs
and their totems, which are regarded as ancestors or as
supernaturally connected with an ancestor.
7. Omen
and Divination: Tribal
peoples live in a constant state of the fear of the future and the
forces, especially that of evil, that surrounded them. Therefore,
they look for indications and warnings about what is likely to happen
in their adventures through sign indicated by animals, birds, etc.
They believe that certain animals or birds are charged with mana and
meeting these can be danger signs. Thus H.H. Presler defines omen as
“any phenomenon believed to have supernaturally inherent portent.”
b) Omen:
Omens are generally classified into two – good and bad.
b)
Divination: In
divination, humans try to seek the signs through animals, plants,
etc. Divination is derived from the latin word deus or divus, meaning
a god or divine, and therefore, divination deals with what the divine
(god) reveals to us.
8.
Magic: Prof. J.B. Noss
defines magic as “an endeavor through utterance of set words, or
the performance of set acts, to control or bend the powers of the
world to men’s will.” 1. Magic is strictly traditional and is
handed down from generation to generation. 2. In magic the attitude
of manipulation is to be found most strongly propitiation and
cajoling in religion. 3. The ends or the goals are different. 5. In
magic there is the professional-client relationship. 6. Magic implies
a simple belief and is a formation of man’s power to cause certain
definite effects by rites and spells. 7. Magic is practical acts
performed as a means to an end. 11. Magic is thought of as at least
potentially directed against the society, whereas this is not the
case in religion.
8. Evil
Eye: All tribals, as
well as the more advanced people of India believe in the evil eye.
Persons, especially the witches and women, certain animals and snakes
are believed to possess malevolent and mischievous eye which has the
power to kill or destroy persons and domestic animals, crops and
houses.
9.
Religious Functionaries:
As in any developed religion on the world, primal religions also
depend a great deal for their religious exercises on religious leader
who we may call “religious functionaries” for lack of
satisfactory terminology.
- Formally constituted religious functionaries:
Under this
category may be mentioned the priest, medicine-men or healer, and
medium and diviner. Priests: in the case of primal religions, since
they do not have temple, church, etc., they are generally connected
with those who offer prayer and sacrifices on behalf of the village
or community in shrines, sacred groves or any other sacred place. He
is normally initiated into the office and he goes through some sort
of training, though some other tribes do not require it. They are the
chief intermediary between God and humans. Their duties include
offering prayers and sacrifices, making libation on behalf of the
community. Household sacrifices are normally done by the head of the
family and thus priests do not have much responsibility for the
individual families. Since the tribal people do not make the sharp
distinction of the ‘sacred’ and the ‘secular’ as it is in
most modern religions, the priest is engaged in all aspects of life.
- Informally constituted functionaries:
Witches,
who are mostly females, are regarded as dangerous to the society. It
is generally believed that while the witch may be asleep physically,
her spirit escapes the body and makes another person sick or die, or
cause abortion to a pregnant woman.
10. Life
after death: The
tribals of Northeast India also seem to share similar idea. It is
generally believed among the tribals that their dead go to the “land
of the dead” where they live the same kind of life as they were
before. Therefore, they need all the things that they needed when
alive.
(Pielral
chanchin vel ziek thei. Pawla saihli, lunglotui, hring lang tlang
etc.)
The main
features of Dalit religion
There is a
debate on whether Dalits are Hindus by religion. While it is said,
“Hinduism is not the religion of the Dalits” it is also said that
it began from Hinduism. It is also written that, the religion is not
Hinduism, but ‘Brahminism’.
It has been
argued that the Dalit religion is a distinct religion. It is not from
Hinduism or from Buddhism. It is said that there are two traditions
in Hinduism – the great
and little
traditions. The great tradition comes from the religious practices of
the high caste communities while the little tradition comes from the
religious practices of the lower castes. However, when the two
traditions are compared, there are more dissimilarities than
commonalities between the two. James Theophilius Appavoo points out
nine stark differences between the two traditions:
- Regarding the Deities; the names, narratives and food offered to them differed.
- Looking at the worship practices, it can be said that the Sanskrit religion originated from a cold climate region while the Dalit religion originated from a hot region.
- In corporate and individual worship Dalit religion is always corporate worship while the Sanskrit religion is individual.
- The Sanskrit religion always has different places for different people while in the Dalit religion, people can gather around the God in a theater or arena.
- The deities of the Sanskrit religion reside in the idols while the Dalits do not attach much importance to the place of worship or the symbols. In fact, the deity is not chained to the symbols, it is in the worshippers.
- In the original religion of the Dalits, there is room for protest while in the Sanskrit religion, there is no room for protest.
- The Sanskrit religion had a group of people set aside for warfare, the Kshatriyas, while in the Dalit religion, there are no such groups.
- The Sanskrit religion has a class or caste system and in the Dalit religion, there is no class or caste.
- In Dalit religion, every one participates actively, in Sanskrit religion, the worshippers have no active participation.
- Religious functionaries – Priests, story tellers, singers, narrator, sacrifice, drum beater/player, ritual performer, dreamer, witchcraft, magician
- Beliefs and practices of primal and dalit people. (A chunga inthawk hin hienghai hi chu ziek thei vawng ning an tih.)
- Influences of Sanskritization/Brahmanization, modernization, Christian missions, Government policies and programmes on religion and society of primal and dalit people.
Sanskritization
M.N.
Srinivas defines Sanskritization as, “a process by which a low
caste or a tribe or other group changes its customs, rituals,
ideology, and a way of life in the direction of a high and
frequently, twice born caste.” These tribes are related to the
majority religion of Hinduism in different ways and their religion
and cultures are affected accordingly. First there is the small group
of tribes who have been Hinduised or Sanskritized long before the
Indian independence and they accepted the Hindu caste structure
though today many 47 of these tribe are also beginning to reject
Hinduism in favour of their pre-Hindu religion and culture. Among
these, the Bhumji, Bhil, Meitei, Tripuri, etc., may be mentioned.
Second, tribes such as the Santhals, Oraos, Mundas, Gonds, etc. may
be considered to have some orientation toward the Hindu religious and
social order without being part of the Hindu caste system. Third,
most of the tribes, especially those who live in the hills of
Northeast India like the Nagas, the Mizos, the Khasis, the
Garos(Achiks) are generally outside the influence of Hinduism.
However, most of the tribals living in the plains of Assam are very
much influenced by Hindu world-view.
Modernization
According
to Smelser, “Modernisation is a complex set of changes that place
almost in every part of society as it attempts to be industrialised.
Modernisation involves ongoing change in a society’s economy,
politics, education,
traditions and
religion.” According to Alatas, “Modernisation is a process
by which modern scientific knowledge is introduced in the society
with the ultimate purpose of achieving a better and amore
satisfactory life in the broadest sense of the term as accepted by
the society concerned.” The religious outlook of the people is
increasingly being influenced by modern scientific knowledge. The
technological changes taking place in the economic life of the people
breakdown the old
semi-feudal village structure and pattern of occupation,
and accelerate the process of urbanization.
(Belsa
el ding)
Christian
Missions (a hnuoia ang hin phuok thei)
- Impact on Cultural life
- Impact on Social Life
- Impact on Economic Life
- Impact on Educational Life
- Impact on Religious Life
- Impact on the Political Life
Governmental
Policies and Programmes
According
to the decrees of the Constitution Order of 1950 (amended 1956 and
1990) of the President of India, the Government recognizes and adds
to the list of Scheduled Castes, only these Scheduled Castes who
profess Hindu or Sikh or Buddhist religions. Hence, Dalit Christians
are not recognized as Scheduled Castes. It is a gross discriminatory
act on the grounds of religion, and a violation of the secular nature
of the democratic State.
The
government measures like the Abolition of Untouchability Act and the
reservation of seats in educational institutions, in government jobs,
legislatures and Parliament also have their impact on the old Dharma
of the country. We also know that there was an attempt at Hindu
reform starting from
the middle of the 19th
century when a number of protest movements from among the Dalits
surfaced in different parts of the country under the impact of
western culture and Christian missionary activity. The fear of losing
reservation benefits keeps them within the Hindu cultural system. On
the other hand, experience hows them that religious change by itself
is not a solution to their problem if they continue to depend
economically on caste Hindus. Reservations do not solve the Dalit
problem. In the absence of a new cultural medium to redefine their
self-image they have no option but to imitate the caste hindus and
hide their real self-identity. The result is, as we saw above, those
who benefit from the reservations are absorbed into the dominant
system and are lost to their community.
- Appraisal: the significance of primal and dalit religions in contemporary society