Discussion on terms of Primal Religion
The religion of the people who live in isolation and in the hills and forests has been given many names by the scholars.
1.
Animism: Sir Edward B. Tylor defines it as “the belief
that all living things as well as everything held by primitive man to be living
because of its locomotion or its ability to assume for itself some power or
animated by spirits.” Although this view influenced many scholars for a long
time, it is not generally accepted anymore because the attitude of animism is
retained even after a higher form of religion is reached.
2.
Tribal
Religion: This term is used
because the people who practice this religion are in tribal stage of
organization. While this is certainly applicable to many situations in the
world, as it is to the tribals in India also, since the basic features of their
religions are confined not only to them but to all peoples of the world, this
term cannot be exclusively used.
3.
Preliterate
Religion: this term is used by
some to mean the religion of the people who do not have written language an
d script. In this theory, literacy is used in a narrow sense of one who can
read and write. However, it must be admitted that oral literacy also is part of
literacy. Therefore, it is a rather narrow outlook.
4.
Primitive
Religion: It is a term which is
very widely used Many scholars, especially the Western writers, tend to use the
term “primitive” in the sense of being inferior, and thus when it is applied to
human beings and their religions, it implies the mistaken notion of mental
processes which are pre-logical and qualitatively inferior to that of the
so-called civilized peoples who assume superiority of race, knowledge and
culture over against other races. However, when we examine the so-called
‘primitive’ people’s 46 mentality and other ways of life objectively, we will
find that they are not ‘primitive’ mentally, spiritually and in their moral
standard. These people have acute mind and intrinsic intelligence and have a
profound thinking and rationalistic ability in their own way. They also have a
great deal of originality in many areas of life. They have a long history,
though unwritten, behind them. Thus this term is seldom used today.
5.
Primal
Religion: This is the term many
scholars now pefer. When we study the religion and practices of the tribal
people we will find that many of the basic features of these people are basic
or primary in the religions of the world. Thus Dr. Harold W. Turner in his booklet
Living Tribal Religions argues that Primal Religions “both anteceded the great
historic religions and continue to reveal many of the basic or primary features
of religion.”
6.
The Dalits and
their history: discussion on terms
such as ‘depressed classes,’ ‘harijans,’ and ‘dalits.’ Historical factors
leading to marginalization of groups in society. The term “Dalit” is
derived from the Sanskrit root dal, which means burst, split,
broken or torn apart. In contemporary times, the term has come to mean things
or persons who are scattered, torn apart or crushed. This contemporary usage to
specify a section of the people of India who have suffered oppression
throughout history under the prevailing religious and social norms goes back
only a few decades. But it must be clearly known that the term Dalit does not
mean caste or low caste; it is used to refer to those people who are living in
deplorable conditions because of social conventions.
Professor Gangadhar Pantawane explained
Dalit as, “Dalit is not a caste. Dalit is a symbol of change and revolution.
The Dalit believes in humanism. He rejects existence of God, rebirth, soul,
sacred books that teach discrimination, fate, and heaven,because these have
made him a slave. He represents the exploited man in country. Dalitness is
essentially a means towards achieving a sense of cultural identity. The
inferiority complex based on ‘to be Dalit’ has now disappeared.”
Martin Macwan explains it as,
“Dalit is the person who believes in equality of all human beings, who
practices equality in one’s own life and who protests wherever human beings are
treated unequally. Dalit therefore is not a caste identity but it is a moral
position.”
In the 19th century, the reformer and
revolutionary Mahatma Jyotiba Phule (1826-1890) had used the
term shudra-atishudra where shudra refer to
the touchables and the atishudra referring to the untouchable
backward castes. In the 20th century, Dr. B.R. Ambedkar (1891-1956)
used the English term ‘untouchable’ for Dalit. In 1973, the Dalit Panther
Movement of the Indian state of Maharashtra, gave new meaning to this term when
they issued a manifesto in which they describe a Dalit as: “members of the
scheduled castes and tribes, neo-Buddhists, the working people, the landless
and poor peasants, women and all those who are being exploited politically,
economically and in the name of religion.” For them, the term is no longer a
mere name or title, but an expression of hope.
In this sense, the Dalit people are
those who, on the basis of caste distinctions, have been considered
“outcastes,” as they are left out of the graded four-fold caste structure of
Indian society. On the basis of this status, they have been oppressed and
exploited over the centuries.
Dalits are called by different names in
different parts of the country. In most cases, the names in which they are
called are despicable or contemptuous. They include: Dasa, Dasysa, Raksasa,
Asura, Avarna, Nisada, Panchama, Chandala, Harijan and Untouchable.
Historical factors
The present condition of the Dalits is the result of the long process of the stratification of the Indian society through the centuries. The four-fold castes eventually gave rise to roughly 3000 sub-castes. The untouchables are actually outside of the list. It should be known that the Dalits or the outcastes or untouchables are at the bottom of the social strata and outside. According to the system, birth determines the caste, not merit or talent. This system was developed from the idea that the different strata were formed from the body of God. The Purusa hymn mentions four castes in this way: The Brahmin was his mouth, of both his arms was the Rajanya (Kshatriya) made, His thighs became the Vaisya, from his feet the Sudra was produced.
Some of the literary sources from which
we can cull some knowledge about the Dalits are the Rigvedas, Upanishads, Ramayana and
the Mahabharata. As quoted above, the Purusa hymn
talked about the system. The Dalits are referred to as Avarna, Dasa and Dasyus.
In the Upanishads, the problem got worse as the Dalits came to be
compared with a dog and a swine. In the Valmiki Ramayana, a Shudra
named Shambuka was killed because he practiced penance. Even in the Mahabharata, an
indigenous boy Ekalabya had to lose his thumb because he has the audacity to
learn archery.
This caste system, in conjunction with
the Hindu scriptures, survived the centuries. This meant that the caste system
received some sort of divine patronage. The desire to break free was however
dampened by the collective ennui of the masses so much so that the outcasts
themselves came to accept it.
Social Conditions
Even today, the Dalits are face
difficulties in the academic field and in ownership or properties. The practice
of untouchability was abolished by the Indian Constitution in 1950. Even though
Article 17 of the Indian Constitution states, “Untouchability is abolished and
its practice in any form is forbidden,” Dalits continue to experience hardships
in all their walks of life. This is a very big tragedy for a fast developing
country like India. Dalits are commonly discriminated. This continues to be a
reality mostly in rural India. Most Dalits remain poor too, without land or
proper employment. Many of them are forced to work in inhumane conditions of
work, in the streets, in the garbage dumps and others places – all for a meager
amount of money. Of the 700 million Dalits mentioned before, roughly 37% live
below the poverty line and more than half of the Dalit children are
malnourished. Many of them are illiterate and are segregated upon. They remain
untouchables in many parts of the country. According to the report of Martin
Macwan titled Dalit Rights, untouchability can be witnessed in the
following categories – Drinking water, food and beverages, religion, touch,
access to public facilities/institutions/services, caste-based occupations,
practices, prohibitions/social sanctions, discrimination in private sector and
discrimination in public facility.
The Main features of Primal and Dalit
Religion
The main features of Primal religion
1. Supreme Being: The Supreme
Being, the Creator and the Sustainer of the universe, is generally neglected
except on special occasions or when His help is sought when everything else has
failed, and He is remembered in every important festivals and social occasions
such as birth, marriage and death. He is also called upon to judge in solemn
oath-taking and during natural calamities such as earthquake, cyclone, drought
and famine. The Supreme Being is not only the Creator and the Sustainer of the
universe, but is also the father of gods and human beings, and among many
tribes god is believed to uphold the moral law.
2. Spirits: Besides the Supreme God, there are many spirits
which the tribals worship. The benevolent spirits are generally that of the
village tutelary, sub-clan, household, ancestor, paddy or cultivation land. The
malevolent spirits are generally that of the village boundary, village
outskirts, the mountains and hills, lakes, rocks, big trees. There are also the
mischievous spirits and ghosts which are not objects of worship and sacrifice
but which have to be exorcised mainly through magic.
3. Mana: Mana is a kind of force or power found in any object
such as a peculiar stone, tree or plant; it may also be found in animals and
human beings. The test of whether an object or a person or an animal has a mana
is the result it can produce. Thus, a Melanesian, for example, may find a
strange-shaped stone, which he may consider to have mana. Then he will take it
home and bury it in his garden, and if he gets a very good crop he will come to
the conclusion that it is a man to produce good crop, and he
will keep it for this purpose.
4. Fetishisms: it is a term adopted by modern English from the
Portuguese word feitico or a charm, a word derived from Latin facticius. A
fetish may be defined as an object which is believed to be inhabited by a
spirit and thus supposed to confer its power upon the person who possesses it
as his fetish. A fetish may be a queer-shaped stone, a bright bead, a stick, a
feather, a claw of beasts, a bone, or a seed or any other curious object.
5. Taboo: the word, ‘taboo’ is taken from a Polynesian dialect,
and introduced into English by captain James Cook in 1777. Taboo is a caution
or prohibition against supernatural objects, plants, animals or human beings
who possess mana. Thus anything that is believed to be taboo should not be
touched, smelled, tasted or heard because such an act will lead to an automatic
supernatural anger or penalty. Some examples are given below. Taboos connected
with supernatural Beings: There are taboos against offending the gods, spirits,
against cutting the sacred trees which are believed to be the abode of the
spirits, against cutting sacred grove or women entering into the sacred grove,
etc.
6. Totemism: a very common social and religious phenomenon in many
parts of the world is the representation of ancestors in the form of totems.
The word “totem” comes from the language of the Ojibway Indian tribe of North
America meaning “brother-sister kin”. It, therefore, signifies a group or a
close relationship, blood-kinship as between members of a family. A totem is
usually of an animal or of plant or insect or bird and very rarely a class of
inanimate objects, very closely related to a group in that the group is
believed to descend from the animal or any of the species mentioned above.
Totemism, therefore, is a ‘form of social organization and religious practice,
typically involving an intimate association between sibs and their totems,
which are regarded as ancestors or as supernaturally connected with an
ancestor.
7. Omen and Divination: Tribal peoples live in a constant state of the fear
of the future and the forces, especially that of evil, that surrounded them.
Therefore, they look for indications and warnings about what is likely to
happen in their adventures through sign indicated by animals, birds, etc. They
believe that certain animals or birds are charged with mana and meeting these
can be danger signs. Thus H.H. Presler defines omen as “any phenomenon believed
to have supernaturally inherent portent.”
b) Omen: Omens are generally
classified into two – good and bad.
b) Divination: In divination, humans try
to seek the signs through animals, plants, etc. Divination is derived from the
latin word deus or divus, meaning a god or divine, and therefore, divination
deals with what the divine (god) reveals to us.
8. Magic: Prof. J.B. Noss defines magic as “an endeavor through
utterance of set words, or the performance of set acts, to control or bend the
powers of the world to men’s will.”
1. Magic is strictly traditional and is
handed down from generation to generation.
2. In magic the attitude of manipulation
is to be found most strongly propitiation and cajoling in religion.
3. The ends or the goals are different.
4. In magic there is the
professional-client relationship.
5. Magic implies a simple belief and is
a formation of man’s power to cause certain definite effects by rites and
spells.
6. Magic is practical acts performed as
a means to an end.
7. Magic is thought of as at least
potentially directed against the society, whereas this is not the case in
religion.
8. Evil Eye: All tribals, as well as the
more advanced people of India believe in the evil eye. Persons, especially the
witches and women, certain animals and snakes are believed to possess
malevolent and mischievous eye which has the power to kill or destroy persons
and domestic animals, crops and houses.
9. Religious Functionaries: As in any
developed religion on the world, primal religions also depend a great deal for
their religious exercises on religious leader who we may call “religious
functionaries” for lack of satisfactory terminology.
a.
Formally
constituted religious functionaries:
Under this category may be mentioned the
priest, medicine-men or healer, and medium and diviner. Priests: in the case of
primal religions, since they do not have temple, church, etc., they are
generally connected with those who offer prayer and sacrifices on behalf of the
village or community in shrines, sacred groves or any other sacred place. He is
normally initiated into the office and he goes through some sort of training,
though some other tribes do not require it. They are the chief intermediary between
God and humans. Their duties include offering prayers and sacrifices, making
libation on behalf of the community. Household sacrifices are normally done by
the head of the family and thus priests do not have much responsibility for the
individual families. Since the tribal people do not make the sharp distinction
of the ‘sacred’ and the ‘secular’ as it is in most modern religions, the priest
is engaged in all aspects of life.
b.
Informally
constituted functionaries:
Witches, who are mostly females, are
regarded as dangerous to the society. It is generally believed that while the
witch may be asleep physically, her spirit escapes the body and makes another
person sick or die, or cause abortion to a pregnant woman.
10. Life after death: The tribals
of Northeast India also seem to share similar idea. It is generally believed
among the tribals that their dead go to the “land of the dead” where they live
the same kind of life as they were before. Therefore, they need all the things
that they needed when alive.
The main features of Dalit religion
There is a debate on whether Dalits are
Hindus by religion. While it is said, “Hinduism is not the religion of the
Dalits” it is also said that it began from Hinduism. It is also written that,
the religion is not Hinduism, but ‘Brahminism’.
It has been argued that the Dalit
religion is a distinct religion. It is not from Hinduism or from Buddhism. It
is said that there are two traditions in Hinduism – the great and little traditions.
The great tradition comes from the religious practices of the high caste
communities while the little tradition comes from the religious practices of
the lower castes. However, when the two traditions are compared, there are more
dissimilarities than commonalities between the two. James Theophilius Appavoo
points out nine stark differences between the two traditions:
a.
Regarding the
Deities; the names, narratives and food offered to them differed.
b.
Looking at the
worship practices, it can be said that the Sanskrit religion originated from a
cold climate region while the Dalit religion originated from a hot region.
c.
In corporate and
individual worship Dalit religion is always corporate worship while the
Sanskrit religion is individual.
d.
The Sanskrit
religion always has different places for different people while in the Dalit
religion, people can gather around the God in a theater or arena.
e.
The deities of
the Sanskrit religion reside in the idols while the Dalits do not attach much
importance to the place of worship or the symbols. In fact, the deity is not
chained to the symbols, it is in the worshippers.
f.
In the original
religion of the Dalits, there is room for protest while in the Sanskrit
religion, there is no room for protest.
g.
The Sanskrit
religion had a group of people set aside for warfare, the Kshatriyas, while
in the Dalit religion, there are no such groups.
h.
The Sanskrit
religion has a class or caste system and in the Dalit religion, there is no
class or caste.
i. In Dalit
religion, every one participates actively, in Sanskrit religion, the
worshippers have no active participation.
j. Religious
functionaries – Priests, story tellers, singers, narrator, sacrifice, drum
beater/player, ritual performer, dreamer, witchcraft, magician.
k.
Beliefs and
practices of primal and dalit people.
l. Influences of
Sanskritization/Brahmanization, modernization, Christian missions, Government
policies and programmes on religion and society of primal and dalit people.
Sanskritization
M.N. Srinivas defines Sanskritization
as, “a process by which a low caste or a tribe or other group changes its
customs, rituals, ideology, and a way of life in the direction of a high and
frequently, twice born caste.” These tribes are related to the majority
religion of Hinduism in different ways and their religion and cultures are
affected accordingly. First there is the small group of tribes who have been
Hinduised or Sanskritized long before the Indian independence and they accepted
the Hindu caste structure though today many 47 of these tribe are also
beginning to reject Hinduism in favour of their pre-Hindu religion and culture.
Among these, the Bhumji, Bhil, Meitei, Tripuri, etc., may be mentioned. Second,
tribes such as the Santhals, Oraos, Mundas, Gonds, etc. may be considered to
have some orientation toward the Hindu religious and social order without being
part of the Hindu caste system. Third, most of the tribes, especially those who
live in the hills of Northeast India like the Nagas, the Mizos, the Khasis, the
Garos(Achiks) are generally outside the influence of Hinduism. However, most of
the tribals living in the plains of Assam are very much influenced by Hindu
world-view.
Modernization
According to Smelser, “Modernisation is
a complex set of changes that place almost in every part of society as it
attempts to be industrialised. Modernisation involves ongoing change in a
society’s economy, politics, education, traditions and religion.” According
to Alatas, “Modernisation is a process by which modern scientific knowledge is
introduced in the society with the ultimate purpose of achieving a better and
amore satisfactory life in the broadest sense of the term as accepted by the society
concerned.” The religious outlook of the people is increasingly being
influenced by modern scientific knowledge. The technological changes taking
place in the economic life of the people breakdown the old semi-feudal
village structure and pattern of occupation, and accelerate the process of
urbanization.
Christian Missions
1.
Impact on
Cultural life
2.
Impact on Social
Life
3.
Impact on
Economic Life
4.
Impact on
Educational Life
5.
Impact on
Religious Life
6.
Impact on the
Political Life
Governmental Policies and Programmes
According to the decrees of the
Constitution Order of 1950 (amended 1956 and 1990) of the President of India,
the Government recognizes and adds to the list of Scheduled Castes, only these
Scheduled Castes who profess Hindu or Sikh or Buddhist religions. Hence, Dalit
Christians are not recognized as Scheduled Castes. It is a gross discriminatory
act on the grounds of religion, and a violation of the secular nature of the
democratic State.
The government measures like the Abolition of Untouchability Act and the reservation of seats in educational institutions, in government jobs, legislatures and Parliament also have their impact on the old Dharma of the country. We also know that there was an attempt at Hindu reform starting from the middle of the 19th century when a number of protest movements from among the Dalits surfaced in different parts of the country under the impact of western culture and Christian missionary activity. The fear of losing reservation benefits keeps them within the Hindu cultural system. On the other hand, experience hows them that religious change by itself is not a solution to their problem if they continue to depend economically on caste Hindus. Reservations do not solve the Dalit problem. In the absence of a new cultural medium to redefine their self-image they have no option but to imitate the caste hindus and hide their real self-identity. The result is, as we saw above, those who benefit from the reservations are absorbed into the dominant system and are lost to their community.
Appraisal: The significance of Primal and Dalit religions in contemporary society:
The importance of Dalit and Primal
(Adivasi/indigenous) religion in modern culture is closely related to social
justice, identity, resistance, and cultural preservation. Despite having
different origins and methods, they both contribute significantly to undermining
established systems and enhancing pluralism. Cultural Identity and
Preservation
1. Cultural Preservation and
Identity: Primal religions—often
associated with Adivasi communities—are rooted in nature worship, oral
traditions, and ancestral practices. In modern society, they:
- Help preserve indigenous knowledge systems, including ecological wisdom and sustainable living.
- Strengthen community bonds and identity, especially in the face of globalization and cultural homogenization.
- Offer alternative worldviews that value harmony with nature rather than exploitation.
Dalit religions, on the other hand, often emerge from a rejection of caste oppression within traditional Hindu structures. Movements inspired by figures like B. R. Ambedkar—especially conversion to Navayana Buddhism—serve as tools for reclaiming dignity and self-respect.
2. Resistance and Social Justice
- Both traditions function as forms of resistance:
- Primal religions resist cultural assimilation and the marginalization of indigenous peoples. They assert land rights, autonomy, and recognition.
- Dalit religions actively challenge caste hierarchy and discrimination, promoting equality and human rights.
- In contemporary India and beyond, these movements contribute to broader conversations on social justice, inclusion, and human dignity.
3. Political and Legal Recognition
There is growing demand for:
- Official recognition of Primal religions as distinct from major organized religions in census and policy frameworks.
- Legal protections for indigenous practices, sacred lands, and cultural rights.
- Continued advocacy for Dalit rights, including anti-discrimination laws and representation.
These struggles highlight tensions
between marginalized communities and dominant socio-political systems.
4. Environmental Relevance
Primal religions are increasingly seen
as important in addressing ecological crises:
Their nature-centric
ethics promote conservation and respect for biodiversity.
They offer insights into sustainable
resource use, which is highly relevant in the age of climate change.
5. Spiritual Alternatives and
Pluralism
Both Primal and Dalit religions enrich
modern society by:
Expanding the idea of spirituality
beyond institutionalized religion.
Encouraging pluralism, where
multiple belief systems coexist.
Providing marginalized groups with
meaningful spiritual frameworks that reflect their lived realities.
6. Challenges They Face
- Despite their importance, these traditions encounter challenges:
- Marginalization and lack of formal recognition.
- Cultural appropriation or dilution.
Socio-economic disadvantages faced by
their communities.
Conclusion
In contemporary society, Primal and
Dalit religions are not just belief systems—they are vehicles of identity,
empowerment, and resistance. They challenge inequality, preserve cultural
diversity, and contribute valuable perspectives on sustainability and justice.

0 comments:
“Thanks for your feedback! I’m glad you found the post helpful.”