CONFLICT AND RECONCILIATION
Despite the fact that advances in travel and communications have shrunk the world to a global village and drawn communities and nations into closer interaction, we still experience interpersonal, interracial, inter-religious and international conflicts. How is it that humanity, which yearns so much for intimacy, almost inevitably moves towards conflict?
The answer is that conflict has
been part of human existence ever since the fall. Sin brings people into
conflict with God, with others and with the natural world. It results in a deep
sense of shame, fear and an unhealthy self-consciousness (Gen 3:6-10). It led
Adam and Eve to attempt to cover their nakedness and to Adam blaming Eve for his
failure (Gen 3:12). The differences between them were no longer something to be
celebrated. Instead, they became a source of threat.
Cain reacted against Abel’s
righteousness by murdering him (Gen 4:1-8). Thereafter, conflict among brothers
becomes a major theme in Genesis. As is often the case today, most of these
conflicts arose due to ownership and sharing of land and resources. The
subsequent history of Israel is one of continuing conflict – intertribal and international
– until first Israel and then Judah went into exile. The trauma of such
conflicts created a longing for reconciliation and peace, captured in the
psalmist’s exclamation, “How good and pleasant it is when God’s people live
together in unity!” (Ps 133:1).
Prophets like Isaiah hold out a
more comprehensive vision of reconciliation that includes all people, not just
“God’s people”. They envisage a day when humanity will live in peace with God,
with each other and with the natural order (Isa 11:1-9; Amos 9:11-15).
Reconciliation lies at the heart of
the gospel. Paul explains that the ultimate purpose of God’s work of salvation
is to reconcile the world to himself (2 Cor 5:18-21). Consequently, both the
ministry and message of the apostolic church are fundamentally about reconciliation.
Paul brings out the social dimensions of this reconciliation when he points out
that Christ’s sacrificial death has taken away the hostility between God and
humanity and made it possible for hostile communities to experience peace with
one another (Eph 2:11-21).
Christians are not immune to
conflicts. We even experience them in the church and families because of our
deep-rooted insecurities, our acquisitive tendencies and the perceived threat
of whatever is different. Those who insist that “wisdom comes with age” clash
with those who are young and seeking change. There are clashes between those
who speak one language and those who speak another, between castes, and between
those who live in the city and those who live in rural areas.
Conflicts, however, are not
insurmountable because Jesus, by his trust in God, selflessness and embracing
of all humanity, has destroyed the basis of conflict and opened the way for
reconciliation.
Through his teachings Jesus not
only anticipated conflicts that would emerge in the new community he
inaugurated but also provided pointers to help the church aim for
reconciliation in such instances. In Matthew 5:23-25 he introduced the radical
concept that the efficacy of our worship is directly related to the harmony
between us. Thus we should settle our differences before coming to worship him.
In Matthew 18:15-17 he sets out the
logical but limited steps a Christian community should take when dealing with
someone who is a source of conflict. He advocates that disagreements should be settled
gently, in private or with only two or three witnesses (see also Gal 6:1; Jas
5:19-20). This approach resonates with typical shame-cultures as in South Asia.
The implication that disputes are better settled by corporate rather than
individual effort also parallels the situation in South Asia, where village
councils and similar bodies play a role in dispute resolution. On the other
hand, there are tendencies in our South Asian context to play down and cover up
serious ethical violations. The fact that an unrepentant Christian faces public
exposure and even excommunication is the counter-cultural gospel corrective to
these tendencies.

0 comments:
“Thanks for your feedback! I’m glad you found the post helpful.”