PROSPERITY THEOLOGY
(from the lens of South Asian Context)
Prabo
Mihindukulasuriya
Prosperity theology is the popular
yet deviant teaching that God will bestow material prosperity and physical
well-being on all believer who claim them by faith. It is characterised by
preaching that downplays the challenge of the cross and instead claims that
every Christian is entitled to enjoy health and wealth. It presents Jesus himself
as a wealthy man, while ignoring his words that he had “no place to lay his
head” (Matt 8:20).
Prosperity teaching originated in North America after the Second World War when Christians sought spiritual grounds for participating in their culture’s unprecedented prosperity. It is also widespread in South Asia because it resonates with popular South Asian religiosity in which Hindus pray to gods and goddesses such as Ganesh, Lakshmi and Saraswati for blessings in business and education.
Similarly Buddhists in Sri Lanka
display pictures of Arahat Sivali in the belief that this will ensure
prosperity and sufficient food for their family. Godmen and women such as Sai
Baba, Amma Rajarajeshwari and Osho Rajneesh are also believed to be able to
dispense success.
The prosperity gospel is harmful
because it misinterprets the Bible, as a closer look at some of the frequently
quoted proof-texts shows. For instance, its proponents will quote 3 John 2: “Dear
friend, I pray that you may enjoy good health and that all may go well with you,
even as your soul is getting along well.” They interpret this as implying
that material wealth and good health are manifestations of spiritual obedience.
But the verse is not a statement of a principle but a prayer for the recipient.
Similarly, those who preach a
prosperity gospel love to quote passages like Luke 6:38: “For with the
measure you use, it will be measured to you.” They claim that those who
give to their ministries are guaranteed a material reward that is proportionate
to the amount they give. In this way, the preachers accumulate riches, much of which
they spend on themselves and their own families, while ignoring the context of
Jesus’ words, which shows that he was actually saying that God will judge us
according to how we judge others. Similarly, they present Malachi 3:10-12 as a
contract in which God guarantees blessing in exchange for tithing, whereas it
is actually a shaming challenge to Israel’s mercenary attitude to the covenant
that saw no profit in obeying God (Mal 3:14). True covenant faithfulness pledges
devotion to God even in the absence of fruitfulness (Hab 3:17-18).
Prosperity teaching misrepresents
God’s purposes for his children. It fails to distinguish between the foretaste
of God’s abundant life we enjoy in the present and its complete bestowal at
Christ’s return.
Christ explained this foretaste in
terms of kinship and economic sharing when he said, “Truly I tell you … no
one who has left home or brothers or sisters or mother or father or children or
fields for me and the gospel will fail to receive a hundred times as much in
this present age: homes, brothers, sisters, mothers, children and fields – along
with persecutions – and in the age to come eternal life” (Mark 10:29-30).
Prosperity teaching also
misrepresents the prosperity of faithful teachers. It implies that they will be
rich. But Paul told the Corinthian church that he and his fellow apostles were
not prosperous but “hungry and thirsty, we are in rags, we are brutally
treated, we are homeless” (1 Cor 4:8-13). Rather than seeking riches, he
explained, “I know what it is to be in need, and I know what it is to have
plenty. I have learnt the secret of being content in any and every situation, whether
well fed or hungry, whether living in plenty or in want” (Phil 4:12).
Rather than enjoying superb health, he had to learn to live with “a thorn in
the flesh” (2 Cor 12:7).
The OT presents sufficiency as the
ideal state. Extremes of either wealth or poverty are to be rejected. That is
why the author of Proverbs prays: “Give me neither poverty nor riches, but give
me only my daily bread. Otherwise, I may have too much and disown you and say,
‘Who is the LORD?’ Or I may become poor and steal, and so dishonour the name of
my God” (Prov 30:8-9; see also 1 Tim 6:5-6).
In the NT, Paul states, “Our desire
is not that others might be relieved while you are hard pressed, but that there
might be equality. At the present time your plenty will supply what they need,
so that in turn their plenty will supply what you need. The goal is equality,
as it is written: ‘The one who gathered much did not have too much, and the one
who gathered little did not have too little’” (2 Cor 8:13-15, quoting Exod
16:18).

0 comments:
“Thanks for your feedback! I’m glad you found the post helpful.”