IS BAPTISM REQUIRED FOR THE FORGIVENESS OF OUR SINS? HOW DOES ACTS 2:38 FIT IN WITH WHAT IS TAUGHT ELSEWHERE IN SCRIPTURE ABOUT SALVATION BY FAITH ALONE?
It's possible to make the Bible
teach anything, no matter how wrong it might be. It is easy to take verses out
of context or misunderstand them by ignoring the rest of Scripture.
One verse that is frequently misunderstood and misused is Acts 2:38. Located at the climax of Peter’s sermon at Pentecost, Peter calls on his listeners to respond to the message he had just given, declaring, “Repent, and each of you be baptized in the name of Jesus Christ for the forgiveness of your sins; and you will receive the gift of the Holy Spirit” (Acts 2:38). Bible readers are frequently confused by this verse. In fact, this verse raises three specific questions. First, are people required to repent of all their sins to be saved or is faith alone in Jesus the only necessity? Second, in addition to faith, is baptism neces-sary for salvation? And third, are people to be baptized “in the name of Jesus” or “in the name of the Father and the Son and the Holy Spirit” (Matt. 28:19)? Let’s look at each of these questions in order.
THE QUESTION OF REPENTANCE
The issue of the need for
repentance is so crucial that this book devotes a whole question to the
relationship of repentance to faith (see Question 2). Still, since it’s clearly
mentioned in Acts 2:38, I'll address it here briefly. One of the clearest teachings
of Scripture (Eph. 2:8-9) is that people are saved by God's grace (undeserved
kindness) by faith in Jesus (trust in His death and resurrection for us). Yet,
here it seems that Peter’s exhortation calls for his listeners to repent, not
just to believe. As a result, it is commonly expected that if someone wants to
come to know the Lord Jesus, they must turn away from all their sin, or at
least feel badly for their sins. 1 would maintain that, although turning from
sin and sadness for sin are both good and proper, they are not essential for
salvation.
Resolving the difficulty with this
verse is in recognizing that the word “repent” used in Acts 2:38 does not mean
to feel remorseful. As used here, the word “repent” means to “change your
mind.” In this context, Peter is calling on his Jewish audience to move from
their previous rejection of the Lord Jesus to trust in Him as their Messiah. He
is saying, “Change your mind about Jesus—move from rejecting Him to trusting
Him.” In reality, repentance and faith are two sides of the same coin. The
repentance side demands that we stop trusting what we previously thought and
the faith side demands that we trust in Jesus. Repentance as found here doesn’t
mean we must feel bad about our sins but rather we need to change from
rejecting Jesus to believing He is both Lord (God) and Messiah (cf. Acts 2:36).
THE ROLE OF BAPTISM
The second issue in this verse is
that Peter seems to be saying that baptism is a required part of the repentance
and faith process. When he said, “Repent, and each of you be baptized... for
the forgiveness of your sins” (Acts 2:38), it seems that, ac-cording to Peter,
baptism is an added requirement. Of course, the Bible consistently teaches that
salvation is by grace alone, through faith alone, “not as a result of works”
(Eph. 2:9; cf. John 3:16, 36; Rom. 4:1-17; Gal. 3:8-9). Requiring baptism for salvation
would add a work on our part to God’s grace. Moreover, when the Lord Jesus
promised the thief on the cross that they would be together in Paradise, He
didn't demand that the thief get off his cross and be baptized first. The
thief’s faith alone in Jesus alone was enough. By faith, he would join the Lord
Jesus in eternity (“Paradise”; Luke 23:42-43).
So how should we understand this
call to baptism? One possible explanation is to translate the word “for” in the
phrase “for the forgiveness of your sins” as “on account of.” That would make
Peter’s message, “Repent and be baptized on account of forgiveness of your
sins.” This ties forgiveness of sin to turning to Jesus and then makes baptism
a consequence, not a cause, of that forgiveness. This translation is possible
because the Greek word (eis used with a noun in the 3:11; 12:41; Mark 1:4). The
problem with this explanation is that this grammatical usage is quite rare and
only found in the Gospels, never in Acts.
A second, and better option, is to
understand the call to be baptized as a parenthetical thought. This idea is
also consistent with the Greek grammar. The command to repent is a plural verb
in Greek. Similarly, the pronoun “your” in “forgiveness of your sins” is also
plural, linking these two concepts together. But the command to be baptized is
singular, as evident in the phrase “each of you be baptized.” So here is a
paraphrase of Peter’s point: “Repent all of you (and if an individual does so,
let each one be baptized) for the forgiveness all y‘all’s sins” (a little
Southern slang clarifies this verse). The main thought of the verse is “All of
you repent for the forgiveness of all all sins.” The parenthetical idea
expressed here is that “if someone does repent, that individual should be
baptized.”
This interpretation fits well with
the rest of Luke’s writings. For example, Luke writes, “everyone who believes
in Him receives forgiveness of sins” (Acts 10:43) and there is no mention of a
need to be baptized. Also, Luke declares that repentance (the other side of
faith) brings forgiveness of sins to Israel (Acts 5:31) with no mention of
baptism. The same idea is found in Luke 24:47, saying that “repentance for
forgiveness of sins would be proclaimed” to the nations (without including
baptism). Taking the command for individuals to be baptized as a parenthetical
statement in Acts 2:38 makes the most sense because it’s in harmony with the
Greek grammar and with the other statements in Acts, mentioned above.‘ So Peter
is calling people to believe in Jesus as their Messiah, and then, in
recognition of this commitment, to be baptized.
THE BAPTISMAL FORMULA
The third issue has to do with the
formula for baptism. In the Great Commission, the Lord Jesus called on His
disciples to “make disciples of all the nations, baptizing them in the name of
the Father and the Son and the Holy Spirit” (Matt. 28:19). This is the clearest
baptismal formula. When we baptize new followers of Jesus, we declare this
Trinitarian statement. Yet, in Acts 2:38 (cf. Acts 8:16; 22:16), Peter says
that individuals who repent should be “baptized in the name of Jesus.”
Calling for people to be baptized
in the name of Jesus is not to be considered a formula but rather an
explanation of baptism. We need to remember that the apostles were Jewish men
raised in first-century Jewish culture. In Judaism, when-ever a person took an
action or gave a teaching, they didn't do so on their own. Rather, they acted
or taught “in the name of” their rabbi or teacher. So, in rabbinic writings, it
might say, “Rabbi Gamaliel taught in the name of Rabbi Hillel” or “Rabbi Shimon
took this action in the name of Rabbi Jochanon.” In this way, they identified
their own teacher and master.
The call to be baptized in the name of Jesus was a way of saying that a person was identifying with the Lord Jesus as his or her master. It was a public declaration that “I have become a follower of Jesus!” The formula used in baptism was the Trini-tarian one but the actual act of baptism was a symbol of public identification with the Lord Jesus as their Messiah and Lord.
FINAL THOUGHTS
There are differences of opinion
about baptism. Some sprinkle water while others practice full immersion. Some
baptize infants while others only baptize believers. But here's what we all
can agree on: That turning to Jesus in faith is what saves us, and baptism
isn’t required for remission of sins. Also, we can know that baptism is an
out-ward symbol of salvation, not a requirement for it. Further, we can all
recognize that when we are baptized in the name of the Father, Son, and Holy
Spirit, we are publicly identifying the Lord Jesus as our eternal Redeemer and
the Master of our lives.


0 comments:
“Thanks for your feedback! I’m glad you found the post helpful.”