Showing posts with label Justice Peace and Inclusive Communities. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Justice Peace and Inclusive Communities. Show all posts

Tuesday, 16 June 2026

PERSECUTION

PERSECUTION

PERSECUTION

Stories of martyrdom reflect the history of Christianity, for in the face of persecution Christianity has had its greatest witnesses. In this century alone, more Christians have been martyred than in all previous centuries put together. Christians continue to suffer death, torture, rape and discrimination for their faith.

Persecution may be incited by religious and political leaders. This type of persecution is growing in South Asia as there is increasing identification of the state with a particular religion. Christians are regarded with suspicion as adherents of a “foreign” religion and are treated as second-class citizens. But persecution also takes place at much lower levels of society if Christianity is viewed as a threat to a particular community’s way of life. Where the gospel is seen as a threat to economic structures and an obstacle to exploitation, people may resort to mob violence. In close-knit societies where a family’s reputation is all-important, those who convert to Christianity may be killed by relatives or forced to marry non-Christians.

None of these types of persecution are new. The Israelites endured slavery and exile. Faithful prophets were hated and persecuted. So were the apostles and other members of the early church. In Ephesus the threat the growing number of Christians posed to the local economy led to riots (Acts 19:23-41). Jesus himself suffered at the hands of political and religious authorities. He was rejected by his family (Mark 3:21) and predicted that the same thing would happen to his followers (Matt 10:16-42).

Jesus’ teaching on persecution was revolutionary. He described those persecuted for righteousness’ sake as “blessed” (Matt 5:10-12) and taught that suffering is a privilege that is part of being his disciple. He also promised that “the gates of death will not prevail” against his church (Matt 16:18). True to his word, the church in Asia refuses to be destroyed. It has become one of the fastest-growing churches in the world, sending out thousands of missionaries.

Mission and persecution are inseparable. In fact, persecution is part of God’s plan, as Jesus demonstrated by his own example of obedience to the cross (Luke 24:25-27). He faced persecution of the worst kind and warned his followers to expect nothing less (John 15:18-25). The cross is our symbol of victory and our lives must be lived in the hope of the resurrection (1 Cor 15:19).


Not all suffering can be defined as persecution. Sometimes we suffer because we are human (Job 5:7), because of something we have done wrong (1 Pet 4:15), or because of circumstances that also affect our unbelieving neighbours. True persecution involves suffering inflicted simply because we follow Christ. Those who are enduring such suffering have to draw comfort from the Lord’s promise of life as the victor’s crown to those who are “faithful even to the point of death” (Rev 2:10).

We sometime wonder why God allows part of his church to be persecuted. We cannot always know the answer to that question. What we do know is that God can use persecution to purge and refine the church (1 Pet 1:6-7). We also know that persecution develops perseverance and character (Rom 5:3-4; Jas 1:2-4). Someone has even said that persecution of one part of the church allows other parts of the church to know what true Christianity looks like.

The classic biblical responses to persecution are flight, fight or faith. There are times when the wisest thing to do is to flee (Matt 2:13-15; 10:23). God can use this response, as seen in Acts 8:1-4 where persecution resulted in the scattering and spreading of the church. The second response is to stay and fight, as Paul did in Acts 22:25-29 where he exercised his legal rights. The third response is faith: enduring persecution with prayer, standing firm and being faithful unto death (Rev 12:11).

There are four things we should do when we face persecution:

• Remember that God has absolute control over the events of history (Acts 4:27, 28). We may not understand his ways, yet we must trust that he is in control (Isa 55:8).

• Consider suffering for Christ a privilege and an honour, accepting persecution and being obedient in tribulation (Acts 5:41; 2 Tim 3:12). God will not take us through more than we can bear and will never leave or forsake us (Rom 8:31, 35-39).

• Forgive our oppressors (Luke 23:34; Col 3:13) and not retaliate, for vengeance belongs to God (Deut 32:35; Rom 12:19-21).

• Continue to testify and spread the gospel in the midst of persecution (Acts 5:29; 8:1). We can do this when we understand persecution as a process which refines and matures our faith (Jas 1:2-4) and makes us overcomers in Christ Jesus (Rev 12:11).

Godfrey Yogarajah


NON-VIOLENCE

NON-VIOLENCE

NON-VIOLENCE

Non-violence has a long history in South Asia. It is an important principle in religions like Jainism, Buddhism and some sects of Hinduism. Many all over the world strive to live without violence. Yet violence and bloodshed persist. Why is this?

The answer is found in Genesis, which makes it clear that violence was not part of God’s original design for his creation, which was “very good” (Gen 1:31). There was perfect peace between the man and the woman, between them and nature, and above all, between them and their creator. However, when sin entered the world, it brought with it violence and death (Rom 5:12). Murder followed (Gen 4:1-16) and soon the whole world became “full of violence” (Gen 6:11), a pattern that continues today.

But in the divine plan, the vision of a non-violent world was not lost. Isaiah provides a glorious glimpse of a non-violent future. When the Messiah rules, the wolf will live with the lamb, the leopard will lie down with the goat, the calf and the lion will be together, the cow will feed with the bear, the lion eat straw like the ox (Isa 11:1-10). The whole of nature will be transformed and will no longer groan in pain (Rom 8:22).

That era still lies ahead. But already Christ has come to the world to take away our sin, grant us his peace and make us new creatures in him (2 Cor 5:17). He introduced the great paradox of the Christian understanding of non-violence: The Good Shepherd who protects and provides for sheep suffered violence, dying on the cross for us (John 10:11). To put it differently, he was both the shepherd and the sacrificial lamb whose death atoned for our sin. In his death, he also showed us how we should live. Thus the cross is the symbol of shame and suffering, forgiveness and humility, sacrifice and victory (1 Pet 2:21-24). It is the antidote to all forms of violence, exploitation and persecution.

All those who follow him are called to be like him. We are called to be peacemakers (Matt 5:9), to overcome anger and violence (Matt 5:21-22), to love even our enemies (Matt 5:43-48) and to be forgiving (Matt 6:12). This is radical teaching as the path is not easy to follow.

How can we forgive someone who consistently acts harshly and unjustly towards us? How can we show solidarity with minorities who are terrorized by those who espouse majoritarian ideologies? How can we understand God’s purposes when innocents meet violent deaths?

How can reconciliation be brought about between warring communities and nations? Is it possible for any human to remain nonviolent in thought, word and deed all the time and in all situations?

There are no easy answers to these questions, although the Scriptures provide many a clue, if we search diligently. Non-violence is not passive resistance or timid surrender. Our Lord’s statement that “when someone strikes you on one cheek, turn the other also” (Luke 6:29) is not a call to tame submission. It is a powerful moral response that should shame and unsettle an enemy.

Rather than calling us to passivity, Christ calls us to make a resolute commitment to a) do no harm to anyone in thought, word or deed; b) forgive those who may have wronged us; c) initiate peacebuilding measures wherever required; d) be willing to suffer shame, pain and persecution for the sake of truth and righteousness, and e) love one and all without discrimination.

Non-violence is not a theoretical moral discourse, but an intensely practical way of life. We are constantly asked to choose between violence and non-violence, and the latter alone assures an abundance of life and a world free of hatred, ill-will and animosity. Violence breeds more violence, and peace fosters more peace. An unflinching commitment to peace and non-violence draws us one step closer to God. As Christ said, “Blessed are the peacemakers, for they will be called children of God” (Matt 5:9).

Joshua Kalapati

LIVING WITH PEOPLE OF OTHER FAITHS

LIVING WITH PEOPLE OF OTHER FAITHS

LIVING WITH PEOPLE OF OTHER FAITHS

A wide range of religions and cultures has characterised human life since time immemorial. However, the phenomenon of plurality is perhaps most noticeable in South Asia with its rich and confusing mosaic of racial, ethnic, linguistic, religious, cultural and social diversity. All of us who live here have to deal with this plurality as part of our everyday lives. For example, when our neighbours are celebrating a festival associated with their faith and offer us some special food associated with the festival, may we eat it? When the village celebrates a harvest festival, should we join in, or wait until the date of the harvest festival in the official church calendar, which may bear no relation to the harvest date in our region? These examples present us with the simple question: How do we go about living alongside people of other faiths?

Let us start by laying out the fundamental principles. Christians are called to live harmoniously alongside people of other faiths while maintaining a conscious witness to the gospel of Jesus Christ and demonstrating the love of God in practice. We are to be in the world, but not of the world. Our ultimate purpose must be to contribute to the establishment of God’s kingdom by providing an opportunity for all to believe and be saved by God’s grace for eternal life. In this sense, we must be like Paul, who saw his task as “the priestly duty of proclaiming the gospel of God, so that the Gentiles might become an offering acceptable to God, sanctified by the Holy Spirit” (Rom 15:16).

In multifaith contexts like South Asia, we will often have to answer questions related to our belief and practice. We must be able to answer such questions humbly but confidently (1 Pet 3:15). For example, when we are asked why we are not performing rituals in order to earn salvation we must humbly explain that salvation is God’s gracious gift. If we are asked questions about our hope of Christ’s return, we should be able to testify to what we believe, and why. If we are asked why we go to church, we must explain that the church is the distinctive global and local community of believers who submit to God and do good to others. As we do this, we must uphold the Bible as the complete code of life, Christ as the cosmic Lord and Saviour, and the finality of his name and the salvation which he brings to all human beings.

It is not always easy to talk about our faith, particularly in situations where Christians face social and religious restrictions. But what we can always do is work to serve our neighbours. Our warrant for doing this goes all the way back to God’s call to Abraham to go and live in a foreign land among people of other faiths and become a blessing to them (Gen 12:1-3). Our Lord too summarised the teaching of the Old and New Testaments as “love your neighbour as yourself” (Luke 10:27).

When Christians live with integrity among others, they win their respect for their work ethic and biblical morality (1 Thess 4:12). Christians’ commitment to showing divine love, care and grace as God’s people constitutes a living testimony to God’s love. It can prompt people to think and draw them to a different morality and spirituality of peace and righteousness. When this happens, Christians are functioning as salt and light in the world, preserving and guiding their communities just as our Lord commanded (Matt 5:13-14).

We should also seek to identify common issues such as poverty, development and the environment on which we can work together with those of other faiths. By working for coexistence, we will also be working towards bringing in the universal peace and goodwill among people of all nations on earth that the angelic hosts sang about at the birth of our Lord Jesus Christ more than two thousand years ago.

However, as we build friendships with those of other faiths, we will increasingly find ourselves facing the challenges outlined in the opening paragraph. Our individual responses to their invitations may vary, and may vary from situation to situation (see Paul’s discussion of eating food offered to idols in 1 Corinthians 8–10 and Romans 14).

As a general rule, we may say that there is no harm in getting involved in cultural practices and customs as long as such involvement does not compromise our faith in Christ. But we may have to pray long and hard for discernment in order to be able t distinguish between what is cultural and what is religious in the areas of tradition, custom and practice.

Pervaiz Sultan


JUSTICE AND RIGHTEOUSNESS

JUSTICE AND RIGHTEOUSNESS

JUSTICE AND RIGHTEOUSNESS

God’s passionate concern for justice and righteousness is as much part of his character as his love is. Thus the psalmist declares, “The LORD loves righteousness and justice; the earth is full of his unfailing love” (Ps 33:5).

To describe someone as “righteous” is to imply that they are loyal, reliable and trustworthy. They will always act fairly and always keep their promises. Thus when we say that God is righteous, we are saying that he can be trusted.

To describe someone as “just” means far more than that they judge on the basis of a set of absolute legal standards. It implies that they reach out to those who have fallen through the social net and try to help them reintegrate into society (Jer 22:3). God’s zeal for justice is part of his moral perfection and his desire for the best for his creatures. It is apparent in all his dealings with his people in redemption and salvation (Isa 51:5; 56:1; 62:1). He is frequently described as the defender of the oppressed, the one who liberates captives and feeds the hungry (Ps 146:7-8).

As God’s covenant people, we are required to be like him, which means that we too must be righteous and just in relation to him and to our neighbours (Mic 6:6-8). Our religious observances are of little value if they are not accompanied by a concern for social justice. Like God, we must demonstrate equality, integrity, truthfulness and honesty in all our attitudes and behaviour.

The OT makes it very clear that concern for the oppressed and the poor is at the heart of the calling of the people of God. The laws regarding the Jubilee Year, for example, were intended to teach his people that hoarding resources at the expense of others is a sin against God (Lev 25). He required his people to redistribute resources – but not just in the form of charity or handouts. Rather, those who controlled resources were to release them to those who had no means to take care of themselves. Justice is not served by maintaining dependency but by equipping the poor with the skills required for them to participate in the economic life of the community.

Through civil law God seeks to redirect fallen humanity’s inclination for greed, power and privilege, and provide a safe and creative environment. Of course, human justice is not perfect. Jesus illustrates this in his parable about a harassed widow fighting a corrupt judicial process (Luke 18:1-8). When the judge finally responds to the desperate woman’s plight, he is motivated not by the high priority of justice but by his own self-interest. But Jesus reminds his followers that God is not negligent like earthly judges. He is the supreme and heavenly trustee of justice and will make sure that it will ultimately triumph – even if the injustice we see around us sometimes tempts us to despair.

Justice brings the possibility of peace. This is evident in Isaiah’s description of the Lord’s reign as a time when “the LORD’s justice will dwell in the desert, his righteousness live in the fertile field. The fruit of that righteousness will be peace; its effect will be quietness and confidence forever” (Isa 32:16-17).

Human rights are important not only in human eyes but also in God’s eyes. He has instituted civil government as a framework to preserve justice and restrain disorder (Rom 13:1). Thus Christians  should be involved in their communities, obey the Ten Commandments, and fulfil God’s law of love under whatever government they find themselves (Rom 13:10). They should be known for their kindness to all.

It takes courage to give voice to the demands of justice and law. We may well have to suffer for doing so. This was what happened to the OT prophets (Heb 11:32-38) and to Christ (1 Pet 3:18). The NT predicts it will also happen to those who follow Christ (1 Pet 3:9, 14- 17; 4:12-19). We can cite many examples of campaigners for justice who have been abused and murdered. The Christian will endure this kind of suffering not because he or she is “a murderer or thief, or any other kind of criminal, or even … a meddler” (1 Pet 4:15), but out of a desire to take love for God into the world.

Richard Howell

Friday, 12 June 2026

CONFLICT AND RECONCILIATION

CONFLICT AND RECONCILIATION

CONFLICT AND RECONCILIATION

Despite the fact that advances in travel and communications have shrunk the world to a global village and drawn communities and nations into closer interaction, we still experience interpersonal, interracial, inter-religious and international conflicts. How is it that humanity, which yearns so much for intimacy, almost inevitably moves towards conflict?

The answer is that conflict has been part of human existence ever since the fall. Sin brings people into conflict with God, with others and with the natural world. It results in a deep sense of shame, fear and an unhealthy self-consciousness (Gen 3:6-10). It led Adam and Eve to attempt to cover their nakedness and to Adam blaming Eve for his failure (Gen 3:12). The differences between them were no longer something to be celebrated. Instead, they became a source of threat.

Cain reacted against Abel’s righteousness by murdering him (Gen 4:1-8). Thereafter, conflict among brothers becomes a major theme in Genesis. As is often the case today, most of these conflicts arose due to ownership and sharing of land and resources. The subsequent history of Israel is one of continuing conflict – intertribal and international – until first Israel and then Judah went into exile. The trauma of such conflicts created a longing for reconciliation and peace, captured in the psalmist’s exclamation, “How good and pleasant it is when God’s people live together in unity!” (Ps 133:1).

Prophets like Isaiah hold out a more comprehensive vision of reconciliation that includes all people, not just “God’s people”. They envisage a day when humanity will live in peace with God, with each other and with the natural order (Isa 11:1-9; Amos 9:11-15).

Reconciliation lies at the heart of the gospel. Paul explains that the ultimate purpose of God’s work of salvation is to reconcile the world to himself (2 Cor 5:18-21). Consequently, both the ministry and message of the apostolic church are fundamentally about reconciliation. Paul brings out the social dimensions of this reconciliation when he points out that Christ’s sacrificial death has taken away the hostility between God and humanity and made it possible for hostile communities to experience peace with one another (Eph 2:11-21).

Christians are not immune to conflicts. We even experience them in the church and families because of our deep-rooted insecurities, our acquisitive tendencies and the perceived threat of whatever is different. Those who insist that “wisdom comes with age” clash with those who are young and seeking change. There are clashes between those who speak one language and those who speak another, between castes, and between those who live in the city and those who live in rural areas.

Conflicts, however, are not insurmountable because Jesus, by his trust in God, selflessness and embracing of all humanity, has destroyed the basis of conflict and opened the way for reconciliation.

Through his teachings Jesus not only anticipated conflicts that would emerge in the new community he inaugurated but also provided pointers to help the church aim for reconciliation in such instances. In Matthew 5:23-25 he introduced the radical concept that the efficacy of our worship is directly related to the harmony between us. Thus we should settle our differences before coming to worship him.

In Matthew 18:15-17 he sets out the logical but limited steps a Christian community should take when dealing with someone who is a source of conflict. He advocates that disagreements should be settled gently, in private or with only two or three witnesses (see also Gal 6:1; Jas 5:19-20). This approach resonates with typical shame-cultures as in South Asia. The implication that disputes are better settled by corporate rather than individual effort also parallels the situation in South Asia, where village councils and similar bodies play a role in dispute resolution. On the other hand, there are tendencies in our South Asian context to play down and cover up serious ethical violations. The fact that an unrepentant Christian faces public exposure and even excommunication is the counter-cultural gospel corrective to these tendencies.

Tuesday, 24 February 2026

NEW TESTAMENT FOUNDATIONS OF HUMAN RIGHTS

NEW TESTAMENT FOUNDATIONS OF HUMAN RIGHTS

NEW TESTAMENT FOUNDATIONS OF HUMAN RIGHTS

1.    Definitions of Human Rights

“Human rights are one of the basic rights that everyone has to be treated fairly and not in a cruel way, especially by their government.”[1]         


 
“Human rights are the fundamental rights that humans have by the fact of being human, and that are neither created nor can be abolished by any government.” It is supported by different international conventions such as the United Nation’s Universal Declaration of Human rights in 1948. These include economic, political, social, cultural rights.[2]

2.    Origin of Human Rights

    2.1 Origin: In 539 B.C., the armies of Cyrus the Great, the first king of ancient Persia, conquered the city of Babylon. But it was his next actions that marked a major advance for Man. He freed the slaves, declared that all people had the right to choose their own religion, and established racial equality. These and other decrees were recorded on a baked-clay cylinder in the Akkadian language with cuneiform script.Known today as the Cyrus Cylinder, this ancient record has now been recognized as the world’s first charter of human rights. It is translated into all six official languages of the United Nations and its provisions parallel the first four Articles of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights.

     2.2 The Spread of Human Rights

From Babylon, the idea of human rights spread quickly to India, Greece and eventually Rome. There the concept of “natural law” arose, in observation of the fact that people tended to follow certain unwritten laws in the course of life, and Roman law was based on rational ideas derived from the nature of things.Documents asserting individual rights, such as the Magna Carta (1215), the Petition of Right (1628), the US Constitution (1787), the French Declaration of the Rights of Man and of the Citizen (1789), and the US Bill of Rights (1791) are the written precursors to many of today’s human rights documents. The Magna Carta, or “Great Charter,” was arguably the most significant early influence on the extensive historical process that led to the rule of constitutional law today in the English-speaking world.[3]In 1215, after King John of England violated a number of ancient laws and customs by which England had been governed, his subjects forced him to sign the Magna Carta, which enumerates what later came to be thought of as human rights. It established the right of widows who owned property to choose not to remarry, and established principles of due process and equality before the law. It also contained provisions unfriendlycorruption and official misconduct.Widely viewed as one of the most important legal documents in the development of modern democracy, the Magna Carta was a crucial turning point in the struggle to establish freedom.[4]. 

     2.3 Petition of Right (1628) 

In 1628 the English Parliament sent this statement of civil liberties to King Charles I. The next recorded milestone in the development of human rights was the Petition of Right, produced in 1628 by the English Parliament and sent to Charles I as a statement of civil liberties. The Petition of Right, initiated by Sir Edward Coke, was based upon earlier statutes and charters and asserted four principles: (1) No taxes may be charged without agreement of Parliament, (2) No subject may be imprisoned without cause shown (3) No soldiers may be quartered upon the citizenry, and (4) Martial law may not be used in time of peace.[5]

3.    Universal Declaration of Human Rights.

The Universal Declaration of Human Rights (Universal Declaration) is an international document that states basic rights and fundamental freedoms to which all human beings are entitled.[6]The Universal Declaration begins by recognising that ‘the inherent dignity of all members of the human family is the foundation of freedom, justice and peace in the world’. It declares that human rights are universal – to be enjoyed by all people, no matter who they are or where they live. The Universal Declaration includes civil and political rights, like the right to life, liberty, free speech and privacy. It also includes economic, social and cultural rights, like the right to social security, health and education.[7] The Declaration was proclaimed by the United Nations General Assembly in Paris on 10 December 1948.GeneralAssembly resolution 217 A as a common standard of achievements for all peoples and all nations. It sets out, for the first time, fundamental human rights to be universally protected and it has been translated into over 500 languages.[8]

1.    We Are All Born Free & Equal. We are all born free. We all have our own thoughts and ideas. We should all be treated in the same way.

2.    Don’t Discriminate. These rights belong to everybody, whatever our differences.

3.    The Right to Life. We all have the right to life, and to live in freedom and safety. 

4.    No Slavery. Nobody has any right to make us a slave. We cannot make anyone our slave. 

5.    No Torture. Nobody has any right to hurt us or to torture us. 

6.    You Have Rights No Matter Where You Go. I am a person just like you! 

7.    We’re All Equal before the Law. The law is the same for everyone. It must treat us all fairly. 

8.    Your Human Rights Are Protected by Law. We can all ask for the law to help us when we are not treated fairly. 

9.    No Unfair Detainment. Nobody has the right to put us in prison without good reason and keep us there, or to send us away from our country. 

10. The Right to Trial. If we are put on trial this should be in public. The people who try us should not let anyone tell them what to do. 

11. We’re Always Innocent Till Proven Guilty. Nobody should be blamed for doing something until it is proven. When people say we did a bad thing we have the right to show it is not true. 

12. The Right to Privacy. Nobody should try to harm our good name. Nobody has the right to come into our home, open our letters, or bother us or our family without a good reason. 

13. Freedom to Move. We all have the right to go where we want in our own country and to travel as we wish. 

14. The Right to Seek a Safe Place to Live. If we are frightened of being badly treated in our own country, we all have the right to run away to another country to be safe. 

15. Right to a Nationality. We all have the right to belong to a country.

16. Marriage and Family. Every grown-up has the right to marry and have a family if they want to. Men and women have the same rights when they are married, and when they are separated.

17. The Right to Your Own Things. Everyone has the right to own things or share them. Nobody should take our things from us without a good reason.

18. Freedom of Thought. We all have the right to believe in what we want to believe, to have a religion, or to change it if we want. 

19. Freedom of Expression. We all have the right to make up our own minds, to think what we like, to say what we think, and to share our ideas with other people. 

20. The Right to Public Assembly. We all have the right to meet our friends and to work together in peace to defend our rights. Nobody can make us join a group if we don’t want to.

21. The Right to Democracy. We all have the right to take part in the government of our country. Every grown-up should be allowed to choose their own leaders. 

22. Social Security. We all have the right to affordable housing, medicine, education, and childcare, enough money to live on and medical help if we are ill or old.         

23. Workers’ Rights. Every grown-up has the right to do a job, to a fair wage for their work, and to join a trade union. 

24. The Right to Play. We all have the right to rest from work and to relax. 

25. Food and Shelter for All. We all have the right to a good life. Mothers and children, people who are old, unemployed or disabled, and all people have the right to be cared for. 

26. The Right to Education. Education is a right. Primary school should be free. We should learn about the United Nations and how to get on with others. Our parents can choose what we learn. 

27. Copyright. Copyright is a special law that protects one’s own artistic creations and writings; others cannot make copies without permission. We all have the right to our own way of life and to enjoy the good things that art, science and learning bring. 

28. A Fair and Free World. There must be proper order so we can all enjoy rights and freedoms in our own country and all over the world. 

29. Responsibility. We have a duty to other people, and we should protect their rights and freedoms. 

30. No One Can Take Away Your Human Rights.[9]

4.    New Testament foundation of Human Rights

4.1 Personhood and New creation

Personhood is literally understood as a state of a being or individual person, with regard to different community and tradition belonging to different sex, caste, religion, cultures etc. Here the word ‘person’ is applied to men, women and children, who are called natural persons. They hold different ranks in the society, family and other associations defending on the capacity and ability they possess. Foundation of human person or personhood can be trace back biblically. Looking at the concept of personhood, biblically it is belief that human being are the imago dei, the image of God (Gen 1:26-27-James 3:9). Being the image of God implies dignity, glory and honor which are the essential aspects of our personhood. Personhood offers us a vision of human dignity, community, freedom, responsible stewardship, human rights, and redemptive renewal, as well as a warning against human self-deception, corruption, dehumanization, and claims of autonomy[10]. Thus, human being has a free will, an openness to the future, with significant real moral choice to make.

Throughout the history, we see how unbiblical views of personhood are used to exploit and oppress people. The strong oppress the weak, injustice against lesser-value group; there is abortion, infanticide, child abuse, and exploitative child labor, slavery, gender violence, class warfare, age discrimination, oppression of the poor etc. This made dehumanize and exclude the people who made in God’s image.

The new creation is a concept found in the New Testament, related to the new life and new man which is referring to the spiritual rebirth through Jesus Christ and also by referring to the Genesis an old creation. Thisis the beginning of the spiritual experience, where we come across the word ‘regeneration’ or ‘rebirth’. This should be the central point for all the believers in understanding Christianity. Human being has a certain God-given rights, even if we are also capable of voluntarily giving those rights up. Here, rights can be mean to pleased human one’s own way, rather cognition of how God has designed humans to interact.Thus we are the fallen beings with a capacity of self-interest and self- deception. We cannot ignore the impact of sin on our total person, both within ourselves and within the larger social system where we reside. Likewise we are called to renewal in Christ, through His death and resurrection. Our personhood is developed and renewed by the work of Holy Spirit upon us (2 Corinth 5:17). Our fullest expression of personhood will be reveled in Christ, the final eternal stage of things. In John 1:13 says, who were born, not of blood or of the will of the flesh or of the will of man, but of God.

4.2 Economic Rights

Economic rights are the branch of socio-economic human rights. Under socio-economic human rights there are social and cultural rights as well. In a more general sense, these rights include, right to education, right to housing, right to adequate standard of living, right to health etc.

The economic, social and cultural rights originated from the socialist tradition which first struck root in early nineteenth century France. It is a response to unbridled capitalist development which saw no wrong in the exploitation of working class and colonial peoples. These rights, unlike civil and political rights, sought the intervention of the State as illustrated in Articles 22-27 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights such as the right to social security; the right to work and protection against unemployment; the right to rest and leisure, including holidays with pay; the right to a standard of living adequate for the health and well-being of self and family; the right to education; and the artistic production. These rights which are essentially claims to social equality have been slow in gaining international recognition. But with the phenomenon of a ‘revolution of rising expectations’ in the Third World, economic, social and cultural rights are beginning to be treated seriously.[11]

According to United Nations, the economic rights which are being formulated in International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights, are as follows:-[12]

·       Article I – all peoples have the right of self-determination. All peoples may for their own ends, freely dispose of their natural wealth and resources without prejudice to any obligations arising out of international economic co-operation, based upon the principle of mutual benefit, and international law.

·       Article 6 – The state Parties to the Present Covenant recognize the right to work, which includes the right of everyone to the opportunity to gain his living by work which he freely chooses or accepts, and will take appropriate steps to safeguard this right.

·       Article 7 – The right of everyone to the enjoyment of just and favourable conditions of work which ensures fair wages and equal remuneration for work of equal value without distinction of any kind, in particular women being guaranteed conditions of work not inferior to those enjoyed by men, with equal pay for equal work, a decent living for themselves and their families in accordance with the provisions of the present covenant. Safe and healthy working conditions. Equal opportunity for everyone to be promoted in his or her employment to an appropriate higher level. Rest, leisure and reasonable limitation of working hours and periodic holidays  with pay, as well as remuneration for public holidays.

·       Article 8 – Right of everyone to form trade unions and join the trade of his choice.

These rights have not only been there in the present time but we have mention about these rights in earlier centuries as well. In fact there are biblical texts also that talks about human rights and particularly economic rights. Before speaking of the Bible, we must look at the other texts of the Near East and other ancient Asian texts which talks about laws and their purposes. In the code of Hammurabi- 13th century BC the legislator states that these laws have been laid down ‘so that the strong should not oppress the weak’. [13] The poor and the oppressed are also given an important place in the bible.

In the Bible it seems that human beings are those who are able to enter into dialogue with God, to listen to him and speak to him, without loss of dignity, standing upright before him. That is a kind of optimistic vision of humanity. The Gospel message is meant to be universal, the radical invitation to practise the Beatitudes presupposes that every human being is able to receive and respond to this message; all human beings are equally able to do this and God of the Gospel has no favourites. [14]

The New Testament texts are clear on that point, especially the Johannine writings. Eternal life beings already here below; those who really love their brothers and sisters, who grant them the right to exist as much as or even more than themselves, those persons are truly alive; those who say they love God and do not love their neighbour are the living dead; it is not those who say ‘Lord, Lord’ who are in a living relationship with God but those who respect and actively promote human rights according to God’s will. [15]

4.3 Socio-cultural rights

4.3.1     What are Socio- Cultural Rights?

Socio- cultural right include right to social security, right to proper housing, right to education, right to food, right to healthcare,[16] right to equality, right to freedom of speech and expression, right against exploitation, right to freedom of religion.[17]

4.3.2     How they are violated?

Some examples of violation of socio- cultural rights-

·       Forcefully evicting people from their homes (the right to adequate housing)

·       Contaminated water supply (the right to health)

·       Failure to prevent starvation in all areas and communities in the country (right to food)

·       Systematically separating children with disabilities from mainstream schools (right to education)

·       Failure to prohibit public and private companies from destroying or contaminating food and its source such as suitable land and water (right to food)[18]

Failure to provide security to women, children, and minority groups (right to social security).

4.3.3     Socio- Cultural context of the first century A.D. in the Greco- Roman society

Women

Jesus lived in the Jewish and the Greco- Roman society in which the male view of women was usually negative and their place was limited to the domestic roles of wife and mother. Women were noticed by male writers to be responsible for most sin and especially for sexual temptation and sin.[19] 

There are some literary evidences that prove the negative view of women in the first century Jewish and Greco- Roman society. First, Josephus states that the law considers women inferior in all matters and therefore women should be submissive. Secondly, Philo refers women and female as examples of weakness. Philo states that women should stay at home, desiring a life of privacy. Thirdly, Sirach, a proto- Pharisaic work from about 180 B.C., presents women either as good wives or as problems. It even states that “better is the wickedness of a man than a woman who does well; it is woman who brings shame and disgrace.” Fourthly, in the writing of Rabbinic Tosefta, it is also said that when a Jewish man prayed three benedictions each day, including one in which he thanked God that he was not made a woman.[20]

Outcast

A person who is not accepted by other people and who sometimes has to leave their home and friends is considered as an outcast.[21] In the New Testament, there are many examples where we can find the existence of people being outcast from the society. For example, the blind man at Bethsaida (Mark 8:22-26), the Samaritan woman (John 4), children (Mark 10:13-16), two blind men receive sight (Matthew 20: 29-34), the bleeding woman (Matthew 9:20-26), leper (Mark 1:40-45) and so on.

4.3.4     Jesus’ response towards social exclusion

Jesus’ respect for and inclusion of women as disciples and proclaimers provided the foundation for the positive place of women in the earliest churches and their ministry. All four gospels give information about Jesus’ relationship to women and the involvement of women in Jesus’ life and ministry. Jesus accepted and supported women who were neglected or rejected within his society. Jesus taught women and included them among his disciples. Women also participated in proclaiming the gospel. Many women associated with Jesus are known by name.[22] 

 



[1] A.S. Hornby, “Human right,” Advanced Learner’s Oxford Dictionary, edited by Sally Wehmeier (New York: Oxford University Press, 2000), 635.

[3]http://www.humanrights.com/what-are-human-rights/brief-history/.28/01/17 11 am.

[4]http://www.humanrights.com/what-are-human-rights/brief-history/

[5]http://www.humanrights.com/what-are-human-rights/brief-history/.

[6]https://www.humanrights.gov.au/publications/what-universal-declaration-human-rights.

[7]https://www.humanrights.gov.au/publications/what-universal-declaration-human-rights

[8]http://www.un.org/en/universal-declaration-human-rights/index.html..

[9]http://www.youthforhumanrights.org/what-are-human-rights/universal-declaration-of-human-rights/articles-16-30.html

[10]http://www3.dbu.edu/mitchell/personho.htm (cited: 1/30/17, 10:12 pm).

[11] Jean Francois six, Church and Human Rights, (St.Paul Publication: United Kingdom, 1992), 13-14

[12] International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights, n.p. [cited 30th January 2017]. Online: http://2covenants.ohchr.org/downloads/ICESCR.pdf. 

[13] Jean Francois six, Church and Human Rights, 34.

[14] Jean Francois six, Church and Human Rights, 36.

[15] Jean Francois six, Church and Human Rights, 41.

[16] What are socio-cultural rights/DrLiam Tho…erpoint.pdf (cited: 24-1-17 3:21pm)

[17] What are socio-cultural rights/l1410776927qHuman Right…19601.pdf/ (cited: 27-1-17, 8:14am)

[18] What are ex…ts?(1).pdf/ (cited:28-1-17, 12:02am)

[19] D.M. Scholer, “Women,” Dictionary of Jesus and the Gospel, edited by Joel B Green and Scot McKnight (Leicester: IVP, 1992), 880.

[20] Ibid.

[21] A.S. Hornby, “Outcast,” Oxford Advanced Learner’s Dictionary 6th Edition (New York: Oxford University Press, 2000), 898- 899.

[22] D.M. Scholer, “Women,” Dictionary of Jesus and the Gospel, edited by Joel B. Green and Scot McKnight (Leicester: IVP, 1992), 880.