Jesus said He would be in the grave
for three days and three nights (Matt. 12:40). But if we count the days from
Good Friday to Resurrection Sunday, it seems there was insufficient time in the
grave. Should we recalculate the Passion Week, with the crucifixion actually
taking place on Thursday?
When people attempt to
recalculate Passion Week, they often do so with the best motive, namely, they
want to take the Bible literally. These people understand that the time from
the crucifixion of Jesus to His resurrection must be a literal 72 hours, as understood
by Jesus’ words in Mat-thew 12:40 (“just as Jonah was three days and three
nights in the belly of the sea monster, so will the Son of Man be three days
and three nights in the heart of the earth”). Therefore, they would conclude
that the Last Supper actually took place on Wednesday of Passion Week, the
crucifixion on Thursday, and the resurrection on Sunday.
A THURSDAY CRUCIFIXION?
Support for a Thursday Crucifixion
Several reasons are given to support a Thursday crucifix-ion of Jesus. First
and most obviously, this would allow Jesus’ burial in the tomb to be literally
three days and three nights. Second, it is maintained that the day of
preparation and the Sabbath described in John 19:31 (“because it was the day of
preparation, so that the bodies would not remain on the cross on the Sabbath
(for that Sabbath was a high day)”) refer to Passover and not the weekend
Sabbath. In this argument, the day of preparation would refer to the day before
Passover, and the Sabbath refers to cessation of work on the first day of
Passover, and therefore it was a high day. Third, the Greek word for Sabbath in
Matthew 28:1 is actually plural, so it describes Resurrection Sunday literally
as “after the Sabbaths.” This would indicate that the resurrection took place
after two Sabbaths, the first on the first day of Passover (Friday) and the
second on the regular Sabbath (Saturday).
Problems with a Thursday
Crucifixion
Although this interpretation
appears to solve the problem by allowing for three full days and nights in the
tomb and a literal understanding of Jesus’ prediction in Matthew 12:40, it does
pose some problems. First, the phrase “day of preparation” always means the
Friday before the weekly Sabbath (“it was the preparation day, that is, the day
before the Sabbath”; Mark 15:42). This is true both in the Bible (Matt. 27:62;
Luke 23:54; John 19:14, 31, 42) and in writings of the first century Jewish
historian Josephus (Antiquities, 16.6). The only reason John 19:14 uses the
phrase “the day of preparation for the Passover” is because, in this case,
Friday, the normal day of preparation, was also the day before Passover. And,
John 19:31 refers to this Sabbath as a high day because it marks the
convergence of both the first day of Passover and the Sabbath.
Second, Passover is nowhere called
a Sabbath in the Bible. The Law of Moses says the first day of Passover is to
be a day without any work (Lev. 23:7; Num. 28:16) but never uses the word
“Sabbath” to describe the festival, as it does the Day of Atonement (Lev.
23:32).
Third, the use of the plural form
for Sabbath (Matt. 28:1) is totally irrelevant because the word “Sabbath” is
commonly in the plural form in the New Testament, even when only one normal
Sabbath day is in view (Matt. 12:1, 5, 10-12; Mark 121: 2-23-24" 3:2, 4;
Luke 4:16, 31; 6:2; 13:10nActsi 23t14; 16:13). This is also true in Josephus
(Antiquities, 12.274) and the Jewish philosopher Philo (On Abraham, 28).
Fourth, the Bible specifies that
the crucifixion and burial of Jesus took place on Friday (“the preparation
day,’ Mark 15:42; see also Matt. 27:62; Luke 23:54, 56; John 19:31, 42) and
that Jesus was raised on the first day of the week or Sunday (Matt. 28:1; Mark
16:1-2; Luke 24:1; John 20:1). So, a literal reading of these verses indicates
a Friday crucifixion and Sunday resurrection. Either this contradicts Matthew
12:40 or there must be a better explanation.
A Friday Crucifixion
The better alternative to
recalculation is to recognize that when Jesus said He would be in the grave for
three days and three nights, He was using a common Jewish cultural expression
called inclusive time reckoning.
In ancient times, Jewish people
used inclusive time reckoning when speaking of any part of a day as referring
to a full day (day and night). An example of inclusive time reckoning in the
Hebrew Scriptures is when Esther called for a fast “for three days, night or
day” (Est. 4:15-16) but then saw the end of the fast “on the third day” (Est.
5:1). Rabbinic literature gives this example from the Mishnah: Rabbi Eliezer
ben Azariah (about AD 100, a contemporary of the Apostle John) taught, “A day
and a night are an Onah (‘a portion of time’) and the portion of an Onah is as
the whole of it” (Shabbat 9:3). Clearly, inclusive time reckoning was a common
practice among Jewish people in the first century.
We often use idiomatic expressions
today when speaking of time. Someone might say, “I did yard work all weekend”
but not really mean every minute from Friday night to Sunday night.
Nevertheless, a listener would still get the point that much of the weekend was
taken up with yard work.
Therefore, I believe we are right
to retain the biblical chronology of Passion Week: Jesus shared His Last Supper
with His disciples on Thursday night, was crucified on Friday, and raised from
the dead early Sunday morning. This time in the tomb includes parts of three
days (Friday night, all day Saturday, and early Sunday), a period of time
idiomatically described with inclusive time reckoning as “three days and three
nights.”
FINAL THOUGHTS
Even more important than
calculating precisely how many hours the Lord Jesus was buried in a tomb is to
recognize the reason for His death and resurrection. He died to pay the penalty
for our sin (2 Cor. 5:21) and was raised to give us new life (Rom. 6:4). Too
often we fall into the trap of arguing over what is least important and
ignoring what is absolutely crucial.

0 comments:
“Thanks for your feedback! I’m glad you found the post helpful.”